I went to my alma mater for five years. I realized the second semester of my junior year that I was never going to finish my pre-vet degree so I had to scramble and switch from pre-vet major/french minor to french major/asian studies minor, hence that fifth year. And someday I’ll stop feeling the need to explain why it took me five years to graduate college — not cuz i’mstoopid, but cuz i’m just chemistry/biology/physics lecture stoopid.
Digression, it’s what’s for dinner.
I graduated in 1997. In 2002 I returned to my alma mater as an employee. For the six years I worked there I participated at a highly involved level on a committee that attracted, accepted, oriented, and welcomed new students to the campus. I was privy to the university’s concern that Vermont is a very homogeneous state where diversity of culture and life experience does not come naturally. Diversity became a manic mission of the administration, and all departments were called upon to integrate diversity plans into their business models. At some point some one or group came up with the idea that placing two faces together of people from different backgrounds somehow equated to an attractive physical representation for people who normally would have disregarded the school as Just Another Rich White Kid Party School.
It’s now a full 8 years since the split faces were added to the orientation print materials for first year students. And here I sit in New York City, casually checking the news of Vermont, and reading that UVM will air commercials to attract prospective students and their families on ESPNU, and felt so hopeful when I saw that “an award winning creative team” helped produce the commercials, but felt that familiar disappointment as I watched each 30-second spot show split-screened faces of what UVM thinks diversity means.
Diversity doesn’t mean trying too hard to say that the population isn’t all just rich white kids. Diversity is organic. And diversity happens because the people within the community foster acceptance in their hearts, in their lives, in their everyday actions. My friends back in Vermont who moved there from Brooklyn struggle daily with Vermont’s passive-aggressive intolerance of non-natives. The state’s unofficial motto truly is “welcome to Vermont, now go home”. And it was always rumored that if you live in Vermont ALLLLL your life except you leave for even a little tiny bit (which I did for 6 months when I was 10, turning 11) that you become a Flatlander, no longer accepted as a Vermonter.
Dude. That’s just fucked up. Why WOULD people from other cultures, backgrounds, ways of thinking, ways of living even WANT to live there?
I think a better ad campaign would be photos and videos of students interacting, working together, doing together, producing together, having a campfire sing-along on the shore of Lake Champlain or a snowball fight on the green, or hanging out previewing a student-made film in the chapel, NOT two students separated in their filming who are glommed together through (not actually so) creative editing. Showing students working, playing, living harmoniously together is what fosters diversity.
And… whoever edited the faces together should be fired, because everyone looks scary together.
My 2 cents. I welcome your thoughts on the matter.
PS – hi. :)





January 22nd, 2010 at 11:30 pm
Hi!
I agree. That shit’s creepy.
January 23rd, 2010 at 3:34 am
I kind of think that their approach is just right. After all, it shows exactly what the mindset going into it was.
Would it be cynical to conjure up “Separate, but equal”?
January 23rd, 2010 at 9:58 am
I agree. The split faces are definitely scary. And i’m glad you’re blogging again.
January 23rd, 2010 at 10:57 am
GAH!! Definitely scary. And tacky. Because, when you think about it, these people were all shot separately then forcibly melded together. THAT’S a message of diversity? Something forced and unnatural?
January 23rd, 2010 at 11:36 am
My college tried this too, it works even less for a college stuck in the northeast georgia mountains. Everybody is milk toast white, and nobody likes diversity. We didn’t even fake it as well as UVM did! Glad to see you back!! :)
January 23rd, 2010 at 3:14 pm
I’d prefer to see that they just produced advertising that never acknowledged the lack of diversity in the past. Just show us what you have going for you. Let us decide based on your merits. College shopping for my daughter was difficult because some places turned ‘diversity’ into an issue.
*hi*
January 23rd, 2010 at 9:05 pm
Honestly, I think this is as bad as the school that photo shopped a student in for diversity. It is both forced and indeed quite frightful.
To me, it doesn’t celebrate diversity. It is promoting a Borg mentality.
January 23rd, 2010 at 10:09 pm
Forced diversity irks me.
January 24th, 2010 at 3:41 am
Eeek! I thought the first one wasn’t too bad, but they just kept getting worse. Your idea is much better anyway. I’d rather see interaction.
January 24th, 2010 at 1:59 pm
Sigh, yes. This is not only misguided, it’s just not fun to look at.
January 26th, 2010 at 6:43 pm
I have so many feelings about this piece it would take a blog entry of my own to even begin to get them all out. Let’s just say I was a native Vermonter and there were plenty of times I didn’t feel tolerated.
January 26th, 2010 at 11:52 pm
It’s like a bad impersonation of Michael Jackson’s “Black or White” video. UVM needs you back, but then NYC wouldn’t have you. So stay here…!
January 27th, 2010 at 8:36 pm
I have to say that just looks weird. What is scary is that someone actually approved that as looking exactly as they hoped it would.
January 29th, 2010 at 7:48 am
Bizarro.
February 1st, 2010 at 1:50 pm
Reminds me of the forced desegregation from decades past. It sucks that it needs to be so contrived, and it’ll likely be many years before they get that crap straight. But it’s a start?
February 4th, 2010 at 5:30 pm
The RFS Blog Awards are back! Get your nominations in